What is emphasized in the best practices for thinking of "How Might We" questions?

The emphasis on being broad but focused in "How Might We" questions is crucial because it allows for creativity and exploration while still providing a clear direction for problem solving. This approach encourages brainstorming a wide range of ideas without being overly narrow, which can stifle innovation. By ensuring that the questions are broad enough, teams can generate diverse solutions and perspectives, but the focus aspect helps guide the ideation process towards relevant and actionable outcomes related to the specific challenge at hand.

In contrast, being overly specific may limit the scope of ideas generated and prevent teams from considering innovative solutions. Focusing solely on design constraints would narrow the discussion to limitations rather than possibilities, which is counterproductive in a brainstorming context. Lastly, limiting the number of drafts does not pertain to the essence of formulating effective "How Might We" questions; the iterative nature of design processes often benefits from multiple drafts and revisions to cultivate and refine ideas. Thus, broad but focused inquiries strike an optimal balance that fosters creative exploration while keeping the discussion aligned with the objectives.