Which of the following is NOT a way to create "how might we" phrases?

The phrase "how might we" is a powerful tool in design thinking that encourages innovative problem-solving by framing challenges as open-ended questions. Each suggested approach uses different strategies to refine ideas and identify opportunities for improvement.

Creating "how might we" phrases revolves around promoting constructive actions towards solutions and fostering creativity. The option that states "give in to user demands" does not align with the objectives of this technique. It suggests a passive acceptance of user requests rather than encouraging active exploration and innovative thinking. This implies a lack of critical engagement with the users' real needs, which is essential in the ideation process.

In contrast, the other options encourage deeper thinking and proactive engagement with the design process. For instance, amplifying the positive aspects focuses on enhancing what already works well, which can lead to the formulation of ideas that capitalize on strengths. Changing the status quo prompts an examination of existing conditions and encourages innovative alternatives, while breaking down a point-of-view into smaller components allows for a more detailed exploration of specific challenges, making it easier to generate targeted "how might we" questions.